Strategic Planning vs. Strategic Plans
Blog: Brian's Blog - Enterprise Strategy, Architecture and Management
Spent last week in my first Enterprise Leadership Team strategic planning onsite meeting. It was one of the better if not best strategic planning sessions I’ve participated in. Rather than focusing on the two extremes –what can be do now to address some mess — or — pie in the sky dreams that have no basis in reality or likely to be realized– the session focused on reviewing where they were, why and what the vision of the business is to be. As we covered what others may mistakenly consider trivial issues in sequence, you could see how these decisions narrowed down options to a laser focus as we at the end of this sequenced redefined or rather clarified what inherently knew was the business design’s skeleton. While there is still much work to be accomplished on this, the skeleton provides the supporting scaffolding to successfully build out.
Strategic Planning and Strategic Plans are all well and good until the touch the reality of engagement. What made the past weeks activities worth the effort were the last two days of the onsite. With knowledge of where we want to be and where we are, we started deployment planning. This is appears to be the fatal flaw in almost all the strategic planning sessions I’ve attended in the US. Without planning how to deploy the plan, strategic planning results in pounds of paper and dilutions. This seems obvious but somehow often gets overlooked.
One could say that’s because the strategic planning activity is designed that way. Or because there are no tools to translate strategic plans into actions. However, both assertions are false. Whether its because strategic planners don’t wish to get involved in deployment or as software designers often say small matter of programming 
or they are unaware of intellectual tools to assist, I find it more attitude that capability. If I was to draw a parallel. Design Engineering is often viewed as more glamorous and desirable that manufacturing Engineering, though its the later that can make or break a company.
With that said I’ll point to several approaches I’ve used, when I’ve been able to make the case to actually plan out implementing a strategic plan: Hoshin Planning, Results Chain (DMR Consulting), Benefits Dependency Network (Cranfield), Strategic Capabilities Network (IBM), and Elyon Strategies own planning methodology. My preferred methods are Hoshin Planning and Elyon’s as both focus on alignment to the strategic goals and a sequence of activities that logically contribute to achievement of the goal. As I write this post I’m thinking of how-to merge Hoshin, Results Chain, and Elyon’s methodology as each as a strong point but a small gap that the other methods address well.
Filed under: Enterprise Architecture, Governance, Strategy, Visual Thinking 
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
