Comment on My DMN 1.2 Wishlist by bogdan
Blog: Method & Style (Bruce Silver)
Having already read your DMN Method and Style book, I understand some of the rationale behind ultimately not linking DMN to SBVR. Yet I feel it’s a lost opportunity.
If the purpose was rapid adoption of DMN by avoiding the intricacies of SBVR, I think this may happen, with the side effect of everyone having their own understanding of DMN style and vocabulary, to the detriment of future interchange efforts and consistent progress of the practice in real business.
An SBVR link together with an accelerator example in DMN would have been like a lighthouse in a darkstorm.
More generally, I believe DMN as a standard is a bit too lax and OMG should get a bit more involved into actually setting standards that are more immediately implementable. Right now it looks a bit like a USB 4.0 standard that says “the connector should have the following features, but how it looks and how it works is up to the value-add of manufacturers” – very friendly, but not driving consistency.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.
