Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) is a program, not a product. Its promise is simple: continuously scope what matters, discover exposures, prioritize by real risk, validate fixes, and mobilize improvements—on repeat. Most teams grasp the cycle but still struggle to make CTEM evidence-driven. That’s where outside-in signals come in.

Why “outside-in” matters

Internal telemetry (EDR, SIEM, CSPM, XDR) tells you what’s happening inside your estate. But attackers stage on the open internet first—probing ranges, spinning up infrastructure, testing credentials, or cloning look-alike domains. Capturing those external signals gives you a leading indicator of what might land tomorrow. Think of it as extending your periscope above the waterline: you see the wake of the threat before it hits the hull.

How outside-in signals contribute to each CTEM phase

Scope: Start by mapping public-facing assets, owned IP ranges, high-value apps, and third-party edges. Outside-in sources help confirm what’s truly exposed versus what’s merely inventoried.

Discover: Enrich your exposure list with adversary interactions: targeted scans, domain impersonation, credential abuse patterns, or campaign infrastructure touching your space. This turns theoretical weakness into observable risk.

Prioritize: Not all critical CVEs are equal. If hostile traffic is actively targeting a service or business function, it moves to the front of the line. Tie prioritization to actor interest and campaign activity, not severity scores alone.

Validate: After remediation, watch for signal decay (a drop in hostile interest against the same asset). This provides tangible evidence that risk is decreasing—useful for executives and auditors.

Mobilize: Feed these signals into case management, SOAR, and takedown workflows. Create playbooks that assign owners, expected outcomes, and time-boxed fixes, then measure follow-through.

 What to collect (tool-agnostic)

• Targeting telemetry: Scans and probes against your IPs/domains, frequency trends, and geographies.
• Adversary infrastructure links: Domains, IPs, ASNs, and hosting patterns associated with known campaigns.
• Impersonation/fraud signals: Typo squats, brand abuse, phishing kits, and look-alike mobile apps.
• Credential/identity hints: Leaked credential patterns or abnormal auth attempts against public interfaces.
• Change signals: Sudden spikes in attention to a crown-jewel asset or new attack paths via third parties.

 4 Steps to programmatic implementation of  outside-in signals for CTEM

1. Define scopes and SLOs (Service Level Objective: Group assets by business service (payments, patient portal, OT line). Set SLOs like “time-to-signal-quiet” (TTSQ)—the time from fix to measurable drop in hostile interest.

2. Integrate flows: Ingest outside-in events into your existing queues. Use labels for scope, asset owner, and business impact, so routing is automatic.

3. Automate decisions: If adversary interest spikes on a crown jewel, automatically open a ticket, page the owner, and trigger a focused validation (attack simulation or control test).

4. Measure, then iterate: Report monthly on TTSQ, exposure burn-down, validation rate, and mean time from “signal-seen” to “control-verified.”

 Where  OpenText Core Adversary Signals fits

You don’t need to re-architect to start. Many teams begin by enriching CTEM with an external signal source—one example is OpenText Core Adversary Signals (OCAS), which monitors internet-scale adversary activity and associates it to your scopes. Treat it as data fuel: consume what’s relevant (targeting, impersonation, infrastructure), push it into your workflows, and measure outcomes. Keep your messaging tool-agnostic; the value is the program you run.

 Pitfalls to avoid

• Inventory without intent: A giant asset list isn’t CTEM. Tie every asset to business impact and outside-in interest.
• Severity tunnel vision: Critical CVEs with zero adversary attention may wait behind medium-severity issues under active attack.
• No validation loop: If you can’t prove signal decay after a fix, you’re guessing—not managing risk.

Bottom line: CTEM delivers when it’s continuous, adversary-informed, and measurable. Outside-in signals give you the earliest, clearest cues about what to fix next—and proof that what you fixed actually changed your risk. That’s how security operations move from chasing alerts to managing exposure.

The post The outside-In signals that make CTEM work  appeared first on OpenText Blogs.