Considering Security Flaws in Open-Source vs. Closed-Source Automation Software

Blog: ProcessMaker Blog

As recent news stories indicate, cyber crime can strike close to home, wreaking havoc on businesses and compelling IT professionals to rethink their security protocols. Hence, a debate has developed regarding open-source vs. proprietary software. Which is the most secure option when it comes to company software? Let’s re-examine this construct via automation software.

Open-source software vs. closed-source automation software

There is a significant difference between open-and-closed-source software, regardless of whether you are responsible for information technology at a large organization or manage your own e-commerce site. Understanding the distinction may significantly impact your role and business practices.

Because open-source software has no limits on who may use or change it, it may be used for anything and by anybody. Additionally, everybody has unfettered and free access to open-source code. It was created using open-source code that is freely available on the Internet. This signifies that the source code is accessible to the public since it may be modified by anybody or any group accessing it. Compared to proprietary software, open-source software enables more significant modification and use.

However, a “closed-source” piece of automation software’s source code is inaccessible to the broader public. CSS is a shortened version of the term. Closed-source software does not make its source code available to input from outsiders. For instance, only the software’s original authors or organization may make changes to it. Closed-source software can also be expensive and often requires the use of a valid license. Because this type of program is distributed under a permissive license, its usage and modification are restricted.

How can you determine which is best based on security flaws?

Consider the following criteria while selecting between open-and-closed-source software:

Closed-source software is often easier to operate than open-source software, as particular user instructions have been developed. Additionally, you may receive recommendations on making the most of these resources. However, this is not always the case when it comes to open-source software.
Closed-source software does provide availability in terms of specialized support teams. Typically, if you’re using open-source software, you’ll need to seek support from the Internet community.
Yet, when you utilize open-source automation software, you can accomplish more with less work. Unless the developers are rewarded, your closed-source program will not be updated.
This means that open-source software is the most cost-effective choice to the maximum degree feasible. Closed-source software is more expensive since it must be customized for each user.

More on security

Since some private technologies are not lucrative, they seldom disclose data dumps. Following a protracted struggle with the company’s customers, you may be able to recover your data from certain online storage locations, or maybe even after your organization has been sued.

The fundamental issue is that even if a company permits data retrieval, access to such data is not guaranteed. If you use your data regularly, it’s realistic to consider it part of your work life. To obtain authorization from a closed-source platform, you must contact the associated developers.

Nonetheless, if you use open-source technologies, you will have exclusive rights to your data. Almost certainly, you’ll come across a duplicate of the information you’re seeking elsewhere. As a consequence, you maintain total control over data transfer across apps. Data may be imported using a calendar and then formatted to match your kanban board. You won’t have to wait for new features to be added since you control your data, database, and software entirely.

Threat actors often prey on easy targets

The lack of data security was exposed in an alarming number of high-profile hacking events in 2014. There are several ways in which public or private information infrastructures might be harmed:

More than 56 million Home Depot customers’ credit card information was compromised in a data breach in November 2014 in the United States and Canada. A third-party vendor exploited a vulnerability in Microsoft Windows to gain the credentials the hackers needed to begin their initial attack. After discovering a security hole, small businesses were penalized for not taking immediate steps to safeguard their information technology systems.
OpenSSL, a popular open-source encryption tool, was targeted in April of the same year. Hackers might have easily accessed personal information belonging to millions of people if the Heartbleed weakness had not been discovered.

Regardless of the software source, the suddenness and intensity of assaults pose a significant threat to consumers and businesses alike, although each crisis is unique.

Use intelligent automation to safeguard your customer data

The artificial intelligence component will earn confidence only after showing the security of that component’s data. The first stage ensures that humans remain at the core of AI operations and that emerging technology fulfills their demands correctly.

Data security requires the capacity to acquire high-quality data. Internal inconsistencies resulting from inaccurate data substantially impact how data is perceived and used. In addition, the use of data sets and good data hygiene practices may contribute to strengthening privacy and digital trust.

Also, the application of risk intelligence may help strengthen the security of consumer data. The client relationship with a business may be summarized as a sequence of essential encounters. Consequently, many of the worries about client data management may be eased.

At this moment in time, it’s difficult to emphasize the critical nature of cybersecurity. Because it is vital, it is a must for the future. Begin by developing a secure architecture that is trustworthy, current, and simple to comprehend. There is no use in coming to a halt at that point. Transparent and honest communication may aid in developing consumer confidence in a business.

It’s crucial to inform your customers of your cybersecurity policy. As a result, buyers are more likely to patronize your business if you can offer proof of leveraging artificial intelligence-assisted technologies to their benefit.

Additionally, artificial intelligence and machine learning are the future of business. Presuming that something cannot be avoided is not always prudent. Customer data is becoming increasingly exposed online. Yet, this can be improved by artificial intelligence. Organizations will continue to face several exciting new opportunities in the future, but data safety must always take first priority.

You do have a choice between open-source and closed-source

Consider the fact that open-source platforms enable programmers to adapt to rapidly changing market demands, resulting in higher-quality goods and services. Many cutting-edge organizations may accept these solutions due to the built-in safety buffers. Due to the large number of individuals contributing to an open-source project and ultimately improving the software, proponents of open source systems assert fewer vulnerabilities and faster patching.

In contrast, closed-source proponents argue that their codebases are more secure and less vulnerable to hacking. Further, closed-source issues may be handled more effectively by a core team due to its system type.

The post Considering Security Flaws in Open-Source vs. Closed-Source Automation Software appeared first on ProcessMaker.