Changing Incentives for Knowledge Workers in the Social Enterprise
Description
Keynote presentation at the APQC Process Conference, Houston, October 2013
Transcript
Changing Incentives For
Knowledge Workers In
The Social Enterprise
APQC Process Conference
Houston 2013
Sandy Kemsley l www.column2.com l @skemsley
Agenda
l
How the enterprise became social
l
The disconnect in adoption of new
methods and tools
l
The culture and management mandates
l
The technology mandate
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
2
The shift in enterprise processes, attitudes and goals
How The Enterprise
Became Social
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
3
Factor #1:
The Nature of Work Changed
Routine Work
Knowledge
Work
Execute transactions
Solve problems
Efficiency
Collaboration
Compliance/standardization
User-created processes
Process improvement
Assist human decisions
Automation
Collect supporting artifacts
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
4
Collaboration In The White Space
Of The Organization Chart
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
5
Source: Luc Galoppin, “Social Architecture: Raising the Bar for our Profession”
Balancing Hierarchy And
Community To Get Things Done
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
6
Source: Luc Galoppin, “Social Architecture: Raising the Bar for our Profession”
Factor #2: Tool Capabilities and
Expectations Changed
l
Consumption
l
Participation
l
Creation
l
User experience
l
Access anywhere
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
7
Factor #3:
Information Everywhere
l
No longer an age of information scarcity:
l
l
l
l
Businesses have rich customer context through
analytics and integration
Customers have competitive business
information
Wide range of public information
Productivity is in analysis and connectivity
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
8
External Social Presence Linked
To Core Business Processes
l
Changes the customer relationship
l
Extends the ends of the process
l
Increases external collaboration
l
Forces operational transparency
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2012
9
Result: The Social Enterprise
Social Feature
Enterprise Benefits
Collaboration
Exploit weak ties for knowledge
sharing and social feedback
= Improved decision-making
User-created
content
Transparency
Use and capture tacit knowledge
= Improved processes
Provide context for work
= Improved problem-solving
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
10
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
11
Real-life benefits of collaboration and user-created content
What Do Social Enterprise
Processes Look Like?
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
12
Social In The Flow Of Work
l
Social features built into enterprise
business processes
l
l
l
l
Collaboration on demand
Zero-training UI for occasional collaborators
Informational visibility and sharing
Situational applications based on
enterprise APIs
l
User-generated processes and content
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
13
Collaborative Process Modeling
l
Multiple people participate in process
discovery, modeling and documentation
l
l
Internal and external participants
Technical and non-technical participants
l
Preserves institutional memory
l
Facilitates cross-silo collaboration and
innovation
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
14
Collaborative Process Modeling
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
15
Dynamic Process Runtime
l
User can add participants from own
network or recommended expert
l
Non-participant can opt-in to process
l
Audit trail captured within BPMS
l
Eliminates uncontrolled email
processes
l
Captures patterns for
process improvement
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
16
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
17
Process Activity Streams
l
Timeline of activity for social monitoring
l
l
l
Process models during creation
Process instances during execution
Publish/subscribe model to “watch” certain
processes or event types
l
Direct link to underlying process model or
instance for unsolicited participation
l
Usually mobile-enabled
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
18
Process Event Streams
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
19
Collaboration at
Bank Of Tennessee
l
Service-focused regional bank
l
Mortgage process before BPM:
l
l
l
l
l
Manual, paper-based
Long process with bottlenecks and errors
Many exceptions, constantly changing
Limited visibility and audit trail
Search for social collaboration and BPM
platforms merged
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
20
Source: Will Barrett, Bank of Tennessee, “Worksocial Pays Dividends”
A Social Mortgage Process
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
21
Bank Of Tennessee: Benefits
l
ROI based on social and BPM
l
l
l
Process activity stream user interface
l
l
l
l
30% faster to complete process
Reduced errors
Unified communication channel
Faster, more efficient actions in place
Increased adoption/decreased training
Improved visibility and audit trail
l
l
Critical SLAs visible for action
Entire process within BPM
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
22
User-Created Content at
Norwegian Food Safety Authority
l
Ensuring food safety, animal/plant welfare:
l
l
l
l
l
Scheduled inspections and events
Emergency response
Maintain food safety history
Apply complex regulations
Case folder with dynamic worklist
l
l
Case = person/establishment, e.g., farm
Tasks created dynamically as required,
manually or triggered by events
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
23
Source: Computas
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
24
NFSA: Dynamic Task Selection
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
25
NFSA: Benefits
l
Entire food safety history for each
establishment
l
Two dynamic case management modes
l
l
Control activity module for regular activities with
full domain data
Emergency response module with alerts and
follow-up tasks
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
26
What is limiting the adoption of social enterprise processes?
The Social Dilemma
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
27
Fear Of…
l
…assuming responsibility for collaboration
l
…having to share credit for work
l
…appearing weak for requiring collaborators
l
…not getting credit for time spent collaborating
l
…helping the competition
l
…losing control over a process
l
…opening access to information
l
…fluid, non-hierarchical roles
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
28
Misaligned Business
Goals And Metrics
l
Executives want
collaboration across
silos; management
required to get work
done on time
l
Process performance
indicators measure
efficiency, not service
levels
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
29
The Employee Incentives Conflict
“When an organization doles out bonuses,
raises, awards and promotions based on
individual contributions, what’s the carrot
for social participation?”
— Gia Lyons, Jive Software
Do the
right thing
What’s in
it for me?
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
30
Misaligned Employee Incentives
l
Incentives based on job description, not
value of contribution
l
Incentives reward individual efforts, not
collaboration
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
31
Mandates for organizational culture, management and technology
Creating A Culture That
Rewards Knowledge Work
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
32
Participatory Culture
l
Time and resources explicitly allocated
l
l
For collaboration and co-creation
All stakeholders expected to participate
l
Appropriate tools provided
l
Input considered regardless of level and
technical skills of participant
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
33
Transparency And Openness
l
Allow internal users to see all information
l
l
Set open as default, override for specific
exceptions
Allow access to external stakeholders
l
Customers, business partners should see their
own information
l
Enables easier knowledge dissemination
l
Provides context for problem-solving and
collaboration
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
34
Management Style Of Trust
l
Allow workers to deviate from pre-defined
workflow when appropriate
l
l
l
Management must allow sufficient autonomy
Workers must feel comfortable
creating/modifying processes
Allow workers to collaborate with resources
of their choice
l
l
Assign work or ask assistance
Internal and external
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
35
Rewards And Incentives
l
Set expectations for participation
l
Reward for collaboration and process
improvement
l
Reward for customer service over
efficiency
l
Reward teamwork over individual effort
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
36
The technology mandate
The Future Of Social
Enterprise Incentives
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
37
Enterprise Social Scoring
l
Peer recognition
l
Gamification
l
Social graph connectivity/strength
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
38
Using Collaboration Metrics
l
Detect and analyze social graph
l
l
Measure contributions to community
l
l
l
Boost signal of weak ties
Social score
Successful performance of task
Recommend collaborators based on
reputation
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
39
Problem-Solving Metrics
l
Customer satisfaction
l
Time to resolution
l
Correlate quality of decision with degree of
collaboration involved
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
40
Next-Generation Social Analytics
l
Evaluate (and reward) collaborative
behaviors that:
l
l
l
l
Are aligned with organizational culture
Get work done
Assist others to achieve shared goals
Resistant to “gaming” by workers
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
41
Summary
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
42
Summary
l
Enterprise processes are social, whether
you admit it or not
l
Misaligned goals and incentives will reduce
success of outcomes
l
Organizational culture and management
style may need to shift
l
Core social process technology is in place,
but metrics are still catching up
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
43
Slides at www.slideshare.net/skemsley
Sandy Kemsley
Kemsley Design Ltd.
email: sandy@kemsleydesign.com
blog: www.column2.com
twitter: @skemsley
Copyright Kemsley Design Ltd., 2013
44
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to post a comment.